DETERMINASI OPINI AUDIT DENGAN PENEKANAN GOING CONCERN PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA

Hendra Firdaus

Abstract


ABSTRACT

 

Going concern opinion accepted by a company represents the condition and events which arises auditor’s hesitation of the company’s going concern. Going concern audit opinion can be used as early warning to the user of financial statements in order to prevent mistakes on decision making. A number of research has been conducted concerning factors that influence to going concern audit opinion. Yet, its result keeps showing inconsistency. This study objective is to reinvestigate factors that influence going concern audit opinion. The factors used on this research are liquidity, leverage, profitability, company’s size, company’s growth, audit lag, and auditor client tenure.This research using sample of manucaturing companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2012-2016. Based on purposive sampling, there are 30 manufacturing companies which fulfilled the sample requirements. Hypotesis testing on this research was done by the logistic regression analysis.

The hypotesis testing showed that leverage have positive relationship to going concern audit opinion. Variables of profitability have negative relationship to going concern audit opinion. Variables of liquidity, company’s size, company’s growth, audit lag  and auditor client tenure have no relationship to going concern audit opinion.


Keywords


going concern audit opinion, liquidity, leverage, profitability, company’s size, company’s growth, audit lag, and auditor client tenure

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agoes, Sukrisno. 2013. Auditing (Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan Oleh Akuntan Publik). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Altman, Edward I. 1968. Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. Journal of Finance. September: 589-609.

Anwar, Sanusi. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Arens, Alvin A., dan James K. Lobbecke. 2009. Auditing dan Jasa Assurance: Pendekatan Terintegrasi), Jilid 1. Edisi 12. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Ashton, Robert H., John J. Willingham, and Robert K. Elliott. 1987. An Empirical Analysis of Audit Delay. Journal of Accounting Research. Vol. 25, No. 2: 275-292.

Auditing Standards Board. 1988. Statement on Auditing Standards No.59: The Auditors’ Consideration of an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. New York: AICPA.

Bazerman, Max H., George Loewenstein, and Don A. Moore. 2002. Why Good Accountants Do Bad Audits. Available at:

http://sds.hss.cmu.edu/media/pdfs/loewestein/WhyGoodAccountants.pdf.

Behn, Bruce K., Steven E. Kaplan, and Kip R. Krumwiede. 2001. Further Evidence on the Auditor’s Going-Concern Report: The Influence of Management Plans. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 20, No.1: 13-18.

Belkaoui, Ahmed R. 2006. Teori Akuntansi. Edisi Terjemahan. Jilid 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Blay, Allen D., and Marshall A. Geiger. 2001. Market Expectation for First Time Going-Concern Recipients. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance. Vol. 16, No. 3: 209-226.

Brigham, Eugene F., and Joel F. Houston. 2009. Fundamentals of Financial Management (Dasar-dasar Manajemen Keuangan). Edisi 10. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Bruynseels, Liesbeth and M. Willekens. 2006. Strategic Viability and Going-

Concern Audit Opinion. Available at:

http://www.placement.abs.aston.ac.uk/newweb/AcademicGroups/fal/ASIG/Bruynseels_Willekens_BAA.pdf.

Boynton Johnson Kell, 2003. Modern Auditing. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Carcello, Joseph V., and Terry L. Neal. 2000. Audit Committee Composition and Auditor Reporting. Available at :

http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=229835.

Chen, Kevin C. W., and Bryan K. Church. 1992. Default on Debt Obligations and the Issuance of Opini Going-Concern Opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 11, No. 2: 30-49.

Clarkson, Peter M., and Dan A. Simunic. 1994. The Association between Audit Quality, Retained Ownership, and Firm-Specific Risk in U.S. vs. Canadian IPO Markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Vol. 17: 207-228.

Craswell, Allen T., Jere R. Francis, and Stephen L. Taylor. 1995. Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specialization. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Vol. 20: 297-322.

DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth. 1981. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Vol. 3: 183-199.

Eisenhardt, K. M. 1998. Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 14, No. 1: 57-74.

Espahbodi, Reza. 1991. Second Opinion, Opinion Shopping and Independence.

The CPA Journal Online.

Fanny, Margaretta dan Sylvia Saputra. 2005. Opini Audit Going concern: Kajian Berdasarkan Model Prediksi Kebangkrutan, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, dan Reputasi Kantor Akuntan Publik (Studi pada Emiten Bursa Efek Jakarta).

Makalah Disampaikan dalam Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VIII. Solo: 15-16 September.

Financial Accounting Standard Board “Statement of Financial Accounting Concept No.1: Objective of Financial Reporting by Business Enterprises”. (Stamford Conn, 1978).

Geiger, Marshall A., and K. Raghunandan. 2002. Going-Concern Opinions in the “New” Legal Environment. Accounting Horizons. Vol. 16, No. 1: 17-26.,

____________,and Dasaratha V. Rama. 2006. Audit Firm Size and Going-Concern Reporting Accuracy. Accounting Horizons. Vol. 20, No.1: 1-17.

Ghozali, Imam. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang:Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Gujarati, D.N. 2003. Basic Econometrics. 4th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Halim, Abdul. 2015. Auditing (Dasar-dasar Audit Laporan Keuangan) Jilid 1. Edisi Kelima. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Hanafi. 2015. Manajemen Keuangan. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Hani, Clearly, dan Mukhlasin, 2003. Going-Concern dan Opini Audit: Suatu Studi Pada Perusahaan Perbankan di BEJ. Makalah Disampaikan dalam Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VI. Surabaya: 16-17 Oktober.

Ho, Joanna L. 1994. The Effect of Experience on Consensus of Going-Concern Judgments. Behavioral Research in Accounting. Vol. 6: 160-172.

Hopwood, W.J., McKeown dan Mutchler, J. 1989. “A test of the incremental explanatory power of opinions qualified for consistency and uncertainty”. The Accounting Review. January : 28-48

Husnan, Suad, dan Enny Pudjiastuti. 2006. Dasar-dasar Manajemen Keuangan. Edisi Kelima. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. 2013. Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. 2015. Standar Akuntansi Keuangan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Iksan, Arfan. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian Akuntansi Keperilakuan. Jakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Jama’an. “Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance dan Kualitas Kantor Akuntan Publik Terhadap Integritas Informasi Laporan Keuangan (Studi kasus Perusahaan Publik yang listing di BEI). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2008.

Januarti, Indira. 2009. Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Perusahaan, Kualitas Auditor, Kepemilikan Perusahaan terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going concern (Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Makalah Disampaikan dalam Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XII. Palembang: 4-6 November.

Januarti, Indira dan Ella Fitrianasari. 2008. Analisis Rasio Keuangan dan Rasio Nonkeuangan yang Memengaruhi Auditor dalam Memberikan Opini Audit Going Concern pada Auditee (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEJ 2000-2005). Jurnal MAKSI. Vol. 8, No. 1: 43-58.

Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behaviour Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 3, No. 4: 305-360.

Junaidi, dan Jogiyanto Hartono. 2010. Faktor Nonkeuangan pada Opini Going concern. Makalah Disampaikan dalam Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII. Purwokerto: 13-15 Oktober.

Jusup, Al Haryono. 2014. Auditing (Pengauditan). Yogyakarta: Bagian Penerbitan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YKPN.

Keputusan Ketua Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal Nomor: KEP-86/BL/2011 Peraturan Nomor VIII.A.2 Tentang Independensi Akuntan yang Memberikan Jasa Audit di Pasar Modal. Available at: www.bapepam.go.id.

Keputusan Ketua Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal Nomor: KEP-34/PM/2003 Peraturan Nomor VIII.A.1 Tentang Pendaftaran Akuntan yang Melakukan Kegiatan di Pasar Modal. Available at: www.bapepam.go.id.

Keputusan Ketua Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal Nomor: KEP-36/PM/2003 Peraturan Nomor X.K.2 Tentang Kewajiban Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan Berkala. Available at: www.bapepam.go.id.

Kevin, C.K. Lam, and Yaw M. Mensah. 2006. Auditor’s Decision Making Under Going-Concern Uncertainties in Low Litigation-Risk Environments: Evidence from Hong Kong. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=899323.

Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J., & Warfield, T. D. 2011. Intermediate Accounting Volume 1IFRS Edition. United States of America : Wiley.

Koh, Hian Chye, and Sen Suan Tan. 1999. A Neural Network Approach to Prediction of Going concern Status. Accounting and Business Research. Vol. 29, No. 3: 211-216.

Komalasari, Agrianti. 2004. Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Auditor dan Proxy Going Concern terhadap Opini Auditor. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan. Vol. 9, No. 2: 1-15.

Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2004. Metode Kuantitatif. Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.

LaSalle, Randal E., and Asokan Anandarajan. 1996. Auditor View on the Type of Audit Report Issued to Entities with Going concern Uncertainties. Accounting Horizons. Vol. 10, No. 2: 51-72.

Lennox, Clive S. 2002. Going-concern Opinions in Failing Companies: Auditor Independence and Opinion Shopping. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=240468.

Lestari dan Chariri. 2007. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pelaporan Keuangan melalui Internet (Internet Financial Reporting) dalam Website Perusahaan. Available at: http://eprints.undip.ac.id/2398/.

Louwers, Timothy J. 1998. The Relation between Going-Concern Opinions and the Auditor’s Loss Function. Journal of Accounting Research. Vol. 36, No.1: 143-156.

Maria Immaculatta. 2006. Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Terhadap Peringkat Obligasi dan Yield Obligasi. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan. Vol. 1, No. 3, 2007.

Masyitoh, Oni Currie and Desi Adhariani. 2010. The Analysis of Determinants ofGoing concern Audit Report. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing. Vol. 6, No.4: 26-37.

Mayangsari, Sekar. 2003. Pengaruh Kualitas Audit dan Independensi terhadap Integritas Laporan Keuangan. Makalah Disampaikan dalam Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VI. Surabaya: 16-17 Oktober.

McKeown, J.R., Jane F.Mutchler, and W. Hopwood. 1991. Toward an Explanation of Auditor Failure to Modify the Audit Reports of Bankrupt Companies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. Supplement: 1-13.

Mills, John R., and Jeanne H. Yamamura. 1998. The Power of Cash Flow Ratio. Journal of Accountancy. October: 53-61.

Mulyadi. 2011. Auditing. Edisi Keenam. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Munawir, S. 2012. Analisis Informasi Keuangan . Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Mutchler, Jane F. 1984. Auditors’ Perception of the Going-Concern Opinion Decision. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. Vol. 3, No.2: 17-30..

A Multivariate Analysis of the Auditor’s Going concern Decision. Journal of Accounting Research. Vol. 23, No.2: 668-682.

. 1986. Empirical Evidence Regarding the Auditor’s Going-Concern. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol.8, No.1: 148-164.

, W. Hopwood, and James M. McKeown. 1997. The Influence of Contrary Information and Mitigating Factors on Audit Opinion Decisions on Bankrupt Companies. Journal of Accounting Research. Vol. 35, No. 2: 295-310.

Nogler, G.E. 1995. The Resolution of Auditor Going Concern Opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol.14, No.2: 54-73.

Noor, Juliansyah. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian. Kencana : Jakarta.

Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna. 1988. An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality. The Accounting Review. Vol. 63, No. 1: 55-73.

Petronela, Thio. 2004. Perkembangan Going Concern Perusahaan Dalam Pemberian Opini Audit. Jurnal Balance. 47-55.

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor: 17/PMK.01/2008 Tentang Jasa Akuntan Publik. Available at: http://www.google.co.id.

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor: 13/POJK.03/2017 Tentang Penggunaan Jasa Akuntan Publik dan Kantor Akuntan Publik dalam Kegiatan Jasa Keuangan.

Praptitorini, Mirna Dyah dan Indira Januarti. 2007. Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Debt Default, dan Opinion Shopping terhadap Penerimaan Opini

Going Concern. Makalah Disampaikan dalam Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X. Makassar: 26-28 Juli.

Rachmawati, Andri dan Hanung Triatmoko. 2007. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Kualitas Laba dan Nilai Perusahaan. Makalah Disampaikan dalam Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X. Makassar: 26-28 Juli.

Rachmawati, Sistya. 2008. Pengaruh Faktor Internal dan Eksternal Perusahaan Terhadap Audit Delay dan Timeliness. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan. Vol.10, No. 1: 1-10.

Raghunandan K, dan Subramanyam, R.K. 2003. Market Informatioan and Predictive Accuracy of the Going Concern Opinion. Http://www.ssrn.com

Rahayu, Puji. 2007. Assessing Going concern Opinion: A Study Based on Financial and Non-Financial Information. Makalah Disampaikan dalam Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X. Makassar: 26-28 Juli.

Ramadhany, Alexander. 2004. Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Memengaruhi Penerimaan Opini Going Concern pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Mengalami Financial Distress di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Tesis. Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Ross, Stephen, R. W. Westerfield, and J. Jaffe. 2002. Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill: New York.

Rudyawan, Arry Pratama dan I Dewa Nyoman Badera. 2008. Opini Audit Going Concern: Kajian Berdasarkan Model Prediksi Kebangkrutan, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, Leverage, dan Reputasi Auditor. Available at: http://www.google.co.id.

Sartono, R. Agus. 2014. Manajemen Keuangan Teori dan Aplikasi. Edisi 4. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Setyarno, Eko Budi, Indira Januarti, dan Faisal. 2006. Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan, Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Makalah Disampaikan dalam Simposium Nasional Akuntansi IX. Padang: 23-26 Agustus.

Schipper, K., and L. Vincent. 2003. Earnings Quality. Accounting Horizons. Vol.70. Supplement: 97-110.

Sinason, David H., Jefferson P. Jones, and Sandra Waller Shelton. 2001. An Investigation of Auditors and Client Tenure. Available at: http://www.bsu.edu/mcobwin/majb/?p=235.

Subekti, Imam, dan N.W. Widiyanti. 2004. Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Audit Delay di Indonesia. Makalah Disampaikan dalam Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VII. Denpasar: 2-3 Desember.

Sudarmadji, Ardi Murdoko, dan Lana Sularto. 2007. Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Leverage, dan Tipe Kepemilikan Perusahaan terhadap Luas Voluntary Disclosure Laporan Keuangan Tahunan. Procedding PESAT. Vol. 2: 21-22 Agustus 2007.

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Cetakan ke-16. Bandung:Alfabeta.

Sumodiningrat, Gunawan. 2010. Ekonometrika Pengantar. Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta: BPFE

Suwito, Edy dan Arleen Herawaty. 2005. Analisis Pengaruh Karakterisrik Perusahaan Terhadap Tindakan Perataan Laba yang Dilakukan Oleh Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Makalah Disampaikan dalam Simposium Nasional Akuntansi (SNA) VIII. Solo: 15-16 September.

Teoh, Siew Hong and T. J. Wong. 1993. Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient. The Accounting Review. Vol. 68, No. 2: 346-366.

Tucker, Robert R., Ella Mae Matsumura, dan K. R. Subramanyam. 2003. Going Concern Judgements: An Experimental Test of The Self-fulfilling Prophecy and Forecast Accuracy. Available at: http://www.ssrn.com. (accessed 1 Desember 2010).

Venuti, Elizabeth K. 2007. The Going concern Assumption Revisited: Assesing a Company’s Future Viability. The CPA Journal Online.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32502/jab.v2i2.1179

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Prodi Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang

Jalan Jend A Yani 13 ULU Palembang 30263

Telp : (0711)511433 Fax :(0711)518015

Email : balance.aktfeb@gmail.com

web:http//jurnal.um-palembang.ac.id/balance

 

https://creativecommons.orgCreative Commons License

BALANCE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.