OPTIMALISASI BIAYA PELAKSANAAN PEMBANGUNAN ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MENGGUNAKAN METODE VALUE ENGINEERING
Abstract
Value Engineering is a multidisciplinary-based systematic approach that is carried out creatively,
innovatively and systematically to find a functional balance between cost, reliability and performance to
achieve the concept of value for money. In value engineering there are six stages. The information stage
carried out 2 analyzes, namely cost breakdown and Pareto diagram analysis, resulting in the largest
work being owned by concrete work with a weight of 37% and a weight of 28% of floor slab work from
the total concrete work. The function analysis stage produces 1 primary function and 4 secondary
functions. The creative stage produces 3 creative ideas, namely the Conventional Method (PA-1),
Floordeck and Wiremesh Method (PA-2), and Hollow Core Slab Method (PA-3). The evaluation stage
resulted in 2 creative ideas that passed. In the development stage, several calculations are carried out
that support all creative ideas. In the evaluation criteria stage, each alternative choice is assessed with
the help of the Expert Choice application, resulting in a total PA-2 value of 20% greater than PA-1. The
calculation of the floor slab design results in the serviceability of PA-2 being 12.67% higher than that of
PA-1. PA-1's NPV is 5% greater than PA-2's. The PA-2 index value is 2.17 smaller than PA-1. The use of
PA-2 can save RAB of IDR 101,372,430.00 or 5%.
innovatively and systematically to find a functional balance between cost, reliability and performance to
achieve the concept of value for money. In value engineering there are six stages. The information stage
carried out 2 analyzes, namely cost breakdown and Pareto diagram analysis, resulting in the largest
work being owned by concrete work with a weight of 37% and a weight of 28% of floor slab work from
the total concrete work. The function analysis stage produces 1 primary function and 4 secondary
functions. The creative stage produces 3 creative ideas, namely the Conventional Method (PA-1),
Floordeck and Wiremesh Method (PA-2), and Hollow Core Slab Method (PA-3). The evaluation stage
resulted in 2 creative ideas that passed. In the development stage, several calculations are carried out
that support all creative ideas. In the evaluation criteria stage, each alternative choice is assessed with
the help of the Expert Choice application, resulting in a total PA-2 value of 20% greater than PA-1. The
calculation of the floor slab design results in the serviceability of PA-2 being 12.67% higher than that of
PA-1. PA-1's NPV is 5% greater than PA-2's. The PA-2 index value is 2.17 smaller than PA-1. The use of
PA-2 can save RAB of IDR 101,372,430.00 or 5%.
Full Text:
PDFDOI: https://doi.org/10.32502/jbearing.v7i4.5501
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Published by :
Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang
P-ISSN : 2085-6261
E-ISSN : 2623-1409
Email : bearing@um-palembang.ac.id
Bearing : Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Teknik Sipil is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.