PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN CARA PERSALINAN: TINJAUAN LITERATUR

Lellyawaty Lellyawaty; Mariani Mariani

doi:10.32502/sm.v13i1.4765

PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN CARA PERSALINAN: TINJAUAN LITERATUR

Lellyawaty Lellyawaty, Mariani Mariani

Abstract

Pemilihan cara persalinan Sectio Caesarea (SC) akhir-akhir ini terjadi peningkatan, terutama pada negara yang berpenghasilan tinggi. Persalinan tidak selalu normal, sehingga diperlukan pengambilan keputusan yang tepat. Tujuan tinjauan pustaka untuk mengetahui faktor apasaja yang mempengaruhi serta hambatan yang ditemukan dalam pengambilan keputusan cara persalinan oleh ibu hamil. Metode penelitian menggunakan literature reviewmelalui database Pubmed, Proquest dan EBSCO. Hasil ditemukan 14 artikel terkait pengambilan keputusan berbagai alasan memilih cara persalinan dengan cara Vagina Delivery (VD) dan SC. Wanita yang memilih VD menyebutkan pemulihan menjadi lebih cepat, sedangkan wanita yang memilih SC beralasan adanya ketakutan akan nyeri persalinan dengan VD. Sumber informasi cara persalinan umumnya didapatkan dari dokter kandungan dan bidan. Adapun orang yang mempengaruhi pengambilan keputusan adalah orang tua, pasangan, teman, dokter dan bidan. Peran tenaga kesehatan seharusnya memberikan konseling berbasis bukti dengan informasi yang tepat sesuai kebutuhan wanita dan selalu melibatkan wanita dalam pengambilan keputusan.

Keywords

pengambilan keputusan, persalinan normal, sectio caesarea

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. Zeeb H, editor. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148343.

Litbangkes. Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia 2017. Jakarta; 2018.

Sumelung V, Kundre R, Karundeng M, Studi P, Keperawatan I, Kedokteran F, et al. Faktor-faktor yang Berperan Meningkatnya Angka Kejadian Sectio Caesarea dI Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Liun Kendage Tahuna. Vol. 2. 2014.

Salfariani I, Nasution SS. Caesarea Tanpa Indikasi Medis Di Rsu Bunda Thamrin Medan. J Keperawatan Klin. 2012;1(1):7–12.

WHO. WHO | WHO recommendations: non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections. WHO. World Health Organization; 2019.

Visser GHA, Ayres-de-Campos D, Barnea ER, de Bernis L, Di Renzo GC, Vidarte MFE, et al. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic. Lancet. 2018 Oct;392(10155):1286–7.

Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349–57.

Sobhy S, Arroyo-Manzano D, Murugesu N, Karthikeyan G, Kumar V, Kaur I, et al. Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1973–82.

Blustein J, Liu J. Time to consider the risks of caesarean delivery for long term child health. BMJ. 2015 Jun 10;350(jun09 3):h2410–h2410.

Begum T, Ellis C, Sarker M, Rostoker JF, Rahman A, Anwar I, et al. A qualitative study to explore the attitudes of women and obstetricians towards caesarean delivery in rural Bangladesh. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Sep 12;18(1):368.

Loke AY, Davies L, Li S fun. Factors influencing the decision that women make on their mode of delivery: the Health Belief Model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 20;15:274.

Shi Y, Jiang Y, Zeng Q, Yuan Y, Yin H, Chang C, et al. Influencing factors associated with the mode of birth among childbearing women in Hunan Province: a cross-sectional study in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Dec 16;16(1):108.

Zhang H, Wu J, Norris J, Guo L, Hu Y. Predictors of preference for caesarean delivery among pregnant women in Beijing. J Int Med Res. 2017 Apr;45(2):798–807.

Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Gutierrez L, Gibbons L, Liu NH, Bonotti AM, et al. Women’s preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Dec 8;16(1):34.

Ezeome I V, Ezugworie JO, Udealor PC. Beliefs, perceptions, and views of pregnant women about cesarean section and reproductive decision-making in a specialist health facility in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;21(4):423–8.

Chen SW, Hutchinson AM, Nagle C, Bucknall TK. Women’s decision-making processes and the influences on their mode of birth following a previous caesarean section in Taiwan: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 17;18(1):31.

Stützer PP, Berlit S, Lis S, Schmahl C, Sütterlin M, Tuschy B. Elective Caesarean section on maternal request in Germany: factors affecting decision making concerning mode of delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May 21;295(5):1151–6.

Schantz C, Sim KL, Petit V, Rany H, Goyet S. Factors associated with caesarean sections in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Reprod Health Matters. 2016 Nov 10;24(48):111–21.

Matinnia N, Faisal I, Hanafiah Juni M, Herjar AR, Moeini B, Osman ZJ. Fears related to pregnancy and childbirth among primigravidae who requested caesarean versus vaginal delivery in Iran. Matern Child Health J. 2015 May 1;19(5):1121–30.

Shirzad M, Shakibazadeh E, Betran AP, Bohren MA, Abedini M. Women’s perspectives on health facility and system levels factors influencing mode of delivery in Tehran: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2019 Dec 8;16(1):15.

Litorp H, Mgaya A, Kidanto HL, Johnsdotter S, Essén B. ‘What about the mother?’ Women?s and caregivers? perspectives on caesarean birth in a low-resource setting with rising caesarean section rates. Midwifery. 2015 Jul 1;31(7):713–20.

Ji H, Jiang H, Yang L, Qian X, Tang S. Factors contributing to the rapid rise of caesarean section: a prospective study of primiparous Chinese women in Shanghai. BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 13;5(11):e008994.

Amyx M, Gibbons L, Xiong X, Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Buekens P, et al. Sources of influence on pregnant women’s preferred mode of delivery in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Birth. 2018;45(1):71–8.

Anim?Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non?epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018(5).

Chen SF, Wang CH, Chan PT, Chiang HW, Hu TM, Tam KW, et al. Labour pain control by aromatherapy: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Women and Birth. 2019 Aug 1;32(4):327–35.

Zhang M, Wang M, Zhao X, Ren J, Xiang J, Luo B, et al. Risk factors for episiotomy during vaginal childbirth: A retrospective cohort study in Western China. J Evid Based Med. 2018 Nov;11(4):233–41.

Verghese TS, Champaneria R, Kapoor DS, Latthe PM. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(10):1459.

Khatony A, Soroush A, Andayeshgar B, Saedpanah N, Abdi A. Attitude of primiparous women towards their preference for delivery method: a qualitative content analysis. Arch Public Health. 2019;77:38.

Cai L, Zhang B, Lin H, Xing W, Chen J. Does vaginal delivery affect postnatal coitus? Int J Impot Res. 2014 Jan 16;26(1):24–7.

Fan D, Li S, Wang W, Tian G, Liu L, Wu S, et al. Sexual dysfunction and mode of delivery in Chinese primiparous women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17.

Afshari P, Dabagh F, Iravani M, Abedi P. Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength in nulliparous women and those with normal vaginal delivery and cesarean section. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Aug 26;28(8):1171–5.

Zhu YC, Deng SH, Jiang Q, Zhang Y. Correlation Between Delivery Mode and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Evaluated by Four-Dimensional Pelvic Floor Ultrasonography. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:7891.

Handelzalts JE, Peyser AW, Krissi H, Levy S, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y. Indications for Emergency Intervention, Mode of Delivery, and the Childbirth Experience. PLoS One. 2017;12(1).

Kabakian-Khasholian T, Portela A. Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17.

Esteves-Pereira AP, Deneux-Tharaux C, Nakamura-Pereira M, Saucedo M, Bouvier-Colle MH, Leal M do C. Caesarean Delivery and Postpartum Maternal Mortality: A Population-Based Case Control Study in Brazil. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153396.

Mueller NT, Mao G, Bennet W, Hourigan S, Dominguez-Bello MG, Appel LJ, et al. Does vaginal delivery mitigate or strengthen the intergenerational association of overweight and obesity? Findings from the Boston Birth Cohort. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017;41(4):497.

Huang K, Yan S, Wu X, Zhu P, Tao F. Elective caesarean section on maternal request prior to 39 gestational weeks and childhood psychopathology: a birth cohort study in China. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):22.

Moosavi A, Sheikhlou SG, Sheikhlou SG, Abdolahi K, Yaminifar L, Maktabi M. Influencing factors in choosing delivery method: Iranian primiparous women’s perspective. Electron physician. 2017 Apr;9(4):4150–4.

Hobbs AJ, Mannion CA, McDonald SW, Brockway M, Tough SC. The impact of caesarean section on breastfeeding initiation, duration and difficulties in the first four months postpartum. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16.

Hoang Nguyen PT, Binns CW, Vo Van Ha A, Nguyen CL, Khac Chu T, Duong D Van, et al. Caesarean delivery associated with adverse breastfeeding practices: a prospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore). 2019 Sep 4;1–5.

Odgers HL, Taylor RAM, Balendran J, Benness C, Ludlow J. Rupture of a caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: A case report. Case Reports Women’s Heal. 2019;22.

Birch Petersen K, Hoffmann E, Rifbjerg Larsen C, Nielsen HS. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil Steril. 2016 Apr;105(4):958–67.

Calì G, Timor?Tritsch IE, Palacios?Jaraquemada J, Monteaugudo A, Buca D, Forlani F, et al. Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta?analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb 7;51(2):169–75.

Butler MM. Exploring the strategies that midwives in British Columbia use to promote normal birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 5;17(1):168.

DESISTO CL, McDONALD JA, ROCHAT R, DIAZ-APODACA BA, DECLERCQ E. Decision Making About Method of Delivery on the U.S.–Mexico Border. Health Care Women Int. 2016;37(4):426.

Daemers DOA, Limbeek EBM van, Wijnen HAA, Nieuwenhuijze MJ, Vries RG de. Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17.

Henriksen L, Grimsrud E, Schei B, Lukasse M. Factors related to a negative birth experience – A mixed methods study. Midwifery. 2017 Aug 1;51:33–9.

Lewis L, Hauck YL, Ronchi F, Crichton C, Waller L. Gaining insight into how women conceptualize satisfaction: Western Australian women’s perception of their maternity care experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16.

Davis CM, Guo M, Miyamura J, Chang A, Nelson-Hurwitz DC, Sentell T. Key Factors in Obstetric Delivery Decision-Making among Asian and Pacific Islander Women by English Proficiency. Hawai’i J Med Public Heal. 2017;76(10):279.

Darsareh F, Aghamolaei T, Rajaei M, Madani A, Zare S. The differences between pregnant women who request elective caesarean and those who plan for vaginal birth based on Health Belief Model. Women and Birth. 2016 Dec;29(6):e126–32.

Bonzon M, Gross MM, Karch A, Grylka-Baeschlin S. Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section – An online survey investigating women’s preferences in Western Switzerland. Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219–27.

Lundgren I, Healy P, Carroll M, Begley C, Matterne A, Gross MM, et al. Clinicians’ views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a study from countries with low VBAC rates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):350.

Hoxha I, Syrogiannouli L, Braha M, Goodman DC, Costa BR da, Jüni P. Caesarean sections and private insurance: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e016600.

Hoxha I, Braha M, Syrogiannouli L, Goodman DC, Jüni P. Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e025356.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32502/sm.v13i1.4765