Focus and Scope

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

All the articles published by Integrasi Journal are generally peer-reviewed. It is a main foundation in publishing a well-written article and brings good change in any field especially education. Therefore, it is utmost importance to meet the ethics and standards of publication for author, editor and publisher.

To maintain the credibility of reviewers in the process of reviewing the articles, there is no fee for the author.

The criteria of reviewing the article

1. Research Focus

2. Up-to-date

3. Contribution to the Field

4. Theoretical Framework

5. References

6. Conclusion

Reviewer

The articles received will be reviewed by professional reviewers in the field who have national and international standards to maintain the quality of publication.

Process Review

1. Filtering the received articles

2. Meeting on the accepted papers and notifying the authors.

3. Reviewing the accepted articles

4. Revision by the authors

5. Final meeting on the complete articles for publication

Publication Frequency

This journal published twice in a year, April and October

Open Access Policy

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.  We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows:

• Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Publication Ethics

It is necessary to agree upon common standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer and the publisher.   

(Perlu disepakati terkait standar etik umum yang diharapkan untuk semua pihak yang terlibat dalam proses penerbitan: penulis, editor jurnal, reviewer dan penerbit.)

Fair play. An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content  without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

(Adil. Seorang editor harus senantiasa mengevaluasi naskah penulis dari sisi konten keilmuwan tanpa kecenderungan yang bersifat SARA, afiliasi atau pandangan politik dari penulis.)

Confidentiality. The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

(Kerahasiaan. Editor dan setiap staf editorial tidak diperkenankan mengungkapkan informasi apapun dari naskah yang dikirimkan kepada orang lain selain penulis, reviewer, dewan editorial, dan penerbit lainnya dengan azas kewajaran.)

Disclosure and conflicts of interest. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

(Publikasi dan Konflik kepentingan. Materi yang tidak dipublikasikan yang tercantum dalam naskah tidak boleh digunakan untuk penelitian editor sendiri tanpa persetujuan tertulis dari penulis. Ide atau Informasi istimewa yang diperoleh melalui review harus dijaga kerahasiaannya dan tidak digunakan untuk keuntungan pribadi. Reviewer tidak boleh meninjau naskah di mana mereka memiliki konflik kepentingan akibat hubungan kompetitif, kolaboratif, ataupun hubungan lain dengan penulis, perusahaan, atau pihak institusi mana pun yang terkait dengan artikel.)

Promptness. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

(Kecepatan. Setiap reviewer yang merasa tidak kompeten untuk meninjau naskah atau merasa tidak dapat meninjau naskah dalam waktu yang ditentukan harus menginfokan alasannya dan mengundurkan diri dari proses review.)

Confidentiality. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

(Kerahasiaan. Naskah yang diterima harus diperlakukan secara rahasia. Naskah tidak boleh ditunjukkan atau didiskusikan dengan orang lain kecuali yang diberi wewenang oleh editor.)

Standards of Objectivity. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

(Standar Pelaporan. Setiap Penulis dari hasil laporan penelitian harus menyajikan laporan yang akurat tentang pekerjaan yang dilakukan serta diskusi yang obyektif mengenai signifikansinya. Data yang mendasari harus diwakili secara akurat di naskah. Naskah harus berisi detail dan rujukan yang cukup untuk mengizinkan orang lain meniru pekerjaan. Pernyataan palsu atau tidak akurat merupakan perilaku yang tidak etis dan tidak dapat diterima.)

Data Access and Retention. Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

(Akses Data dan Retensi. Penulis diminta memberikan data mentah sehubungan dengan makalah untuk tinjauan editorial, dan harus siap memberikan akses publik terhadap data tersebut (sesuai dengan Pernyataan ALPSP-STM tentang Data dan Database), jika dapat dilakukan, dan dalam kondisi apapun mampu untuk menyimpan data tersebut untuk waktu yang wajar setelah publikasi.)

Abstracting & Indexing

This journal has been indexed by:

• Garuda
• OneSearch
• Google Scholar
• Cross Reff

Plagiarism Policy

Integrasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri apply Zero tolerance towards plagiarism and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) when plagiarism is identified in an article that is submitted for publication in Integrasi. Integrasi will use Turnitin as a tool to detect text similarity in article manuscripts and final versions of articles that are ready for publication.

Papers must be original, unpublished, and not pending publication elsewhere. 

Author must attach Turnitin report before the article is processed.

The Editorial Board will follow these guidelines:

1. Similarity Index above 40%: Article Rejected (due to poor citation and/or poor paraphrasing, article outright rejected, NO RESUBMISSION accepted).
2. Similarity Index (25-40%): Send to the author for improvement (provide correct citations to all places of similarity and do good paraphrasing even if the citation is provided).
3. Similarity index Less than 25%: Accepted or citation improvement may be required (proper citations must be provided to all outsourced texts).

In cases 2 and 3, the authors should revise the article carefully, add required citations, and do good paraphrasing to outsourced text. And resubmit the article with a new Turnitin report showing NO PLAGIARISM and similarity of less than 25%.