Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal SULUH ABDI lmerupakan jurnal ilmiah yang menyajikan hasil karya ilmiah yang bersumber dari Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat di Indonesia. Terbit pertama pada Juni 2019.

Jurnal ini dimaksudkan sebagai media kajian ilmiah hasil pengabdian dari implementasi kepada Masyarakat, pemikiran dan kajian analisis-kritis mengenai berbagai isu yang dapat dimanfaatkan baik secara nasional maupun internasional. Artikel ilmiah dimaksud berupa kajian implementasi dari Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan serta disebarluaskan secara nasional maupun internasional.

Jurnal SULUH ADBI sebagai bagian dari semangat menyebarluaskan ilmu pengetahuan hasil dari pengabdian pada Masyarakat yang dilakukan oleh Peneliti di Indonesia berbagai bidang ilmu.

Jurnal SULUH ABDI menyediakan artikel-artikel yang dapat diunduh secara gratis. Dengan jadwal terbit 2 (dua) kali setahun, yaitu Juni dan Desember.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Publication Frequency

Suluh Abdi journal is published twice a year; in June and December with ten articles for each edition. It is also published in two versions; print out and electronic.


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



SULUH ABDI : Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat follows the guidelines set out by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in all aspects of publication ethics, in particular, protocols of research and publication misconduct. SULUH ABDI : Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat adheres to the COPE guidelines that ensure high quality standard of ethics for authors, editors, and reviewers:


  1. Authors attest that the material has not been previously published and that they have not transferred any rights to the article to another party.
  2. Authors should ensure the originality of their work and must properly cite others work in accordance with the approved references format.
  3. Authors should not engage in plagiarism or self-plagiarism.
  4. An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
  5. Authors should make all data and details of their work available to the editors if there are suspicions of data falsification or fabrication.
  6. Authors of the article should clarify any possible conflicts of interest such as their job role, research expenses, consultant expenses, and intellectual property.
  7. When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.


  1. Editors are responsible for every article published in SULUH ABDI : Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat.
  2. Editors should assist authors, where possible, to ensure their articles adhere to SULUH ABDI : Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat guidelines.
  3. Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers when making final decisions regarding publication.
  4. An editor must evaluate manuscripts objectively for publication; judging each on its merit without bias towards nationality, ethnicity, political beliefs, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation of the authors.
  5. Editors should decline articles if there is a potential conflict of interest. 
  6. Editors must ensure that documents sent to reviewers do not contain private information of the authors and vice versa. 
  7. The editor's final decision should be relayed to authors in a timely fashion and will be accompanied by the reviewer's comments, unless they contain offensive or libelous remarks. 
  8. If authors have a well-reasoned objection to a certain individual reviewing their work, editors should respect this request. 
  9. Editors and all staff should guarantee the confidentiality of the submitted manuscript.
  10. Editors will be guided by the COPE guidelines if there is a suspected misconduct or disputed authorship.


  1. Reviewers are required to comment on possible research, ethical, and publication misconduct if they are suspected. 
  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  3. Reviewers must complete the work in a timely manner and should notify the editor immediately if they cannot complete the work.
  4. Reviewers are to respect the confidentiality of the manuscript. 
  5. Reviewers should not accept manuscripts for assessment if they believe there is a potential conflict of interest between them and any of the authors.
  6. A reviewer should call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  7. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.