THE EFFECT OF FISHBOWL TECHNIQUE AND STUDENTS’ INTEREST TOWARD THE EIGHT GRADE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY OF SMP XAVERIUS 1 PALEMBANG

Andika Andika

Abstract


This study was purposed at investigating the effect of Fishbowl technique and students’ Interest toward the eighth Grade students’ speaking ability. The population of this study was 300 students of SMP Xaverius 1 Palembang. From the population, there were 30 students taken as sample of experimental group and 30 students were as control group. The sample was taken using two stages random sampling. In carrying out the research, the writer used a factorial group design. Finnaly the calculation using a two-way ANOVA was used to measure an interaction between fishbowl technique and students interest on their speaking ability. Test of Between-Subjects Effects analyses, the significant value of the techniques (fishbowl and conventional) and the students’ interest were 0.422, the probability sig. of technique was 0.175, and the interaction between high and low interest was 0.097 which higher than the significant level of p-value 0.05, it meant that there was no a significant interactions between students’ interest and techniques. So, the research hypothesis that stated “there is no an interaction between fishbowl technique and interest toward students’ speaking ability” was accepted and the null hypothesis was not rejected based on the data finding on chapter four.


Keywords


speaking; fishbowl; interest

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi. (1993). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Yogyakarta: IKIP. Yogjakarta.

Basrowi and Soenyono. (2007). Metode Analysis Data social. Kediri. Cv jenggala Pustaka Utama.

Brown, H.D. (1994). Teaching by Principles: an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.

Brown, H. Douglas. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.

Brown, H. Douglas. (2004). Language Assessment Principle and Classroom practiceL . Longman: San Fransisco State university

Brozo, Bill (2007). Fishbowl Discussions. Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Dawson, Catherine. (2007). a practical guide to Research method . Oxport University.

Fraenkel, Jack R and Norman R, Wallen. (1990). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York. NY: McGraw Hall, Inc.

Grugeon, and Dawes. (2005). Teaching Speaking & listening in the primary School. Typeset by FiSH Books, London

Harmer, Jeremy. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Pearson Longman.

Hatch, Evelyn and Hossein Farhady. (1982). Research Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Newbury House Publisher, Inc.

Hughes, Arthur. (1989). Testing for Language Teachers. London: Cambridge University Press.

Hulsman. (2002). a Theory of Interest. The Quarterly journal of Austrian Economic vol 5, no.4 (winter 2002).

Ihsan, Diemroh. (2005). Reading for the Course Teaching and Learning Strategies. Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Sriwijaya University.

Kusmaryati, Sri Endang. (2009). Improving Speaking Ability Through Classroom Discussion for Students of Manu Banat Kudus in Academic Year 2008/2009.(online (http://eprints.umk.ac.id/145/1/IMPROVING_ENGLISH_SPEAKING_ABILITY. accessed on 2 February 2013.

Lee,Chao and Chen. (2011). The Influence of Interest in Learning and Learning Hours on Learning Outcomes of Vocational College Students in Taiwan; using a Teachers’ Instructional Attitude as the Moderator. Global jurnal of engineering education. Taiwan.

Miller and Benz. (2010). Techniques for Encouraging Peer Collaboration: online threaded Discussion or fishbowl interaction. Journal of instructional psychology. University of Nebraska at Kearney.

Olsen. (2011). Creating Conversation in the Classroom. Teen TLC. Classroom guide.www.tennTLC,tuk. Edu.

Richard, Jack. (2008). Teaching Listening and Speaking from Theory to Practice. Cambridge university press.

Siegle, Del. (2009). The Importance of Recognizing Student’s Interest. Parenting for High Potential. Magazine, washinto dc 20036.

Sharma, Nilema. (2012). Guidelines for Assessment of Speaking and Listening Skills (ASL) for Summative Assessment I & II. Journal of Central Board of Secondary Education.New Delhi.

Team. (2009). Building dynamic group, fishbowl. The OHIO University Extension.http://hostedweb.cfaes.ohio-state.edu/bdg/pdf_docs/d/F03.pdf . accessed on 2 february 2013.

Trumper, Ricardo. (2006). factor affecting junior high school students’ interest in biology. Faculty of Science and Science Educational. Haifa University, Israel.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32502/ecj.v2i2.1316

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 English Community Journal

The Departement of English Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang

Jl. Jenderal A. Yani 13 Ulu, Seberang Ulu II, Palembang (30263), Indonesia.

Indexed by :

English Community Journal has been listed in :

 

Creative Commons License
English Community Journal by http://jurnal.um-palembang.ac.id/index.php/englishcommunity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.