Yoga Pratama


The objectives of this study were to find out whether or not there was significant improvement in writing and speaking achievements of the eighth grade students of SMPN1 Jarai after they were taught by using Sociogram, to find out whether or not there was significant improvement in each aspect of writing and speaking achievements of the eighth grade students of SMPN1 Jarai after they were taught by using Sociogram, to find out whether or not there was significant difference in writing and speaking achievements between the eighth grade students of SMP 1 Jarai who were taught by using Sociogram and those who were not, and to find out the perception of the eighth grade students of SMPN 1 Jarai after they were taught by using Socoiogram. In this paper, an experimental research method with pre and post test control group design was used with 70 students as the sample divided into two groups, experimental and control group. However, only the students of the experimental group were taught by using Sociogram. The obtained data were analyzed by using t-test. The students were given questionnaire to know their perceptions. The result showed that there was a significant difference in both students? writing and speaking achievements after they were tought by using Sociogram. Furthermore, it was found that there was a significant difference in students? writing and speaking achievement between the experimental and control groups. In conclusion, Sociogram improves the students? writing and speaking achievements.


writing; speaking; sociogram

Full Text:



Akmalia. A. F. (2012). The use of sociogram to improve students’ ability in reading narrative text for junior high school (An action research) of the eighth grade students of SMP negeri 1 moga semarang, ( Unpublished Thesis ). Semarang : Graduate school, Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Anderson. (1997). Narrative, identity, and agency. Retrieved From: .

Arikunto,S.(2002).Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktis.Jakarta: Rhineka Cipta.

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (BNSP). (2006). Panduan penyusunan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan jenjang pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta : BNSP.

Beach, R. W., & Marshall, J. D. (1990). The teaching literature in the secondary school. New York, NY : Harcourtt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

Becker, A. (2006). A review of writing model research based on cognitive processes. Retrieved from

Bieger, G. R., & Garlach, G. J. (1996). Educational research: A practical approach. New York: Delmar Publisher.

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1988). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Language assessment principles and classroom practices. San Francisco: Longman.

Burnkart, G. C. (1998). Spoken language: What is and how to teach it. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Byrne, D. (1993). Teaching writing skills. London: Longman.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Discourse and context in language teaching: A guide for language teacher. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge Univeristy Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planing, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Columbus, OH: Pearson Education, Ltd.

Cryistal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Graddol, D. (2006). English next. London: British Council.

Harmer, J. (1998). How to teach English. New York, NY : Longman group.

Harmer, J. (2006). The practice of English language teaching. London: Longman.

Heaton , J. B. (1990). Writing English language tests. New York : Longman Group Hornby, A. S. (1995).Advanced Oxford learner’s dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.

Hubbert, M. D. (2008). The Speaking-Writing Connection: Integrating Dialogue into a Foreign Language Writing Course. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8 (2), 170–183.

Inderawati, R. (2011). The application of reader response approach and the use of facebook as a medium to appreciate literary works. Retrieved from

Johnson, T. D., and Louis, D. R. (1987). Literacy through literature. New Hampshire : Heineman.

Kagan. (2012). A teacher fosters social competence with cooperative learning. Kagan publishing.Retrievedfrom: _rationale/185/A-Teacher-Fosters-Social-Competence-With-Cooperative-Learning,3.

Kane, T. S. ( 2000).The oxford essential guide to writing. New York, NY: Barkley Books.

Khamkhien, A. (2010). Thai Learners? English Pronunciation Competence: Lesson Learned from Word Stress Assignment. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 757-764.

Kemdikbud Republik Indonesia. (2013) Materi pelatihan guru. Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta : Depdikbud.

Ljungdhal, L. (2010). Creative strategies with literature: Developing literacy in the classroom. Retrieved from

Massi, M. P. (2001). Interactive Writing in the EFL Class: A Repertoire of Tasks. The Internet TESL Journal 1.

Meyers, A. (2005). Gateways to academic writing: Effective sentences paragraphand essay. New York, NY: Longman.

Moreno, J. L. (1951). Sociometry, experimental method and the science of society. An approach to a new political orientation. New York, NY : Beacon House.

Nunan D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Linse, C., & Nunan, D. (2006). Task based language teaching in asia context: Defining „ Task?. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3) , 12-18.

Patel, M. F., & Jain P. M ,(2008). English language teaching (methods, tools, techniques). Valshail nagar, Jaipur : Sunrise Publisher and Distribution.

Peninngton, M. (2008). How to use context clues to improve reading comprehension and vocabulary. Accesed from

Popham, J. W., &. Sirotnik, K.. A. (1973). Educational statistic use and interpretation. New York, NY: Harper and Row Publisher.

Purves, A., Rodger, C. T., &.Sotter, A. O. (1990).How porcupines make love II: Teaching a response- centered literature curriculum. London : Longman.

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge Univeristy Press.

Saylor. (2012). Pre- writing activities. Saylor Academy. Retrieved from:

Setiyadi, B. (2006). Metode penelitian untuk pengajaran bahasa asing, Pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Snyder, I. (2002). Silicon literacies : Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age. London : Routledge.

Solcova. B. C. P. (2011). Teaching speaking skill. Masaryk University. Retrieved From:

Sturm, J., & Koppenhaver, D. A. (2000). Supporting writing development in adolescents with developmental disabilities.

Language Disorder, 20(2). 246- 263.

Stevens, D., & Fleming, M . (2004). English teaching in the secondary school:Linking theory and practice. London : David Fulton.

Suwandi & Taufiqulloh. (2009). Designing speaking test. Explanation, 4(8). 183-191.

Sugiyono. (2003). Metode penelitian kualitatif kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung :Alfabeta.

Sya? diyah. H. (2004). Improving students’ ability in writing descriptive texts through a picture series aided learning strategy. (Unpublished Thesis).

Thornbury, S. (2005). How to teach speaking. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Wallen, N. E.,& Fraenkel, J.R. (1991). Educational research: A guide to the process. New York, NY: Mc Graw- Hill, Inc.

Webster, M. (1995). Merriam-webster’s pocket dictionary. Massachusetts: Merriam Webster Incorporated.

White, R. (1988). Academic writing : Process and product. ELT Documents:Association with British Council (Publishers), 129, 4-16.

Widiati, U., & Cahyono, B. (2006). The teaching of EFL speaking in Indonesia context: The State of Art. Bahasa dan Seni, 32(2), 269-297.

Yule, G. (2001). The study of language. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.

Yale, J. B. (2010). The relationship between reading and writing. Retrieved March 11, 2010 from



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 English Community Journal

The Departement of English Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang

Jl. Jenderal A. Yani 13 Ulu, Seberang Ulu II, Palembang (30263), Indonesia.

Indexed by :


English Community Journal has been listed in :


Creative Commons License
English Community Journal by is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.