THE POLITENESS STRATEGIES: MALE AND FEMALE POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN A GROUP DISCUSSION

Helena Verusha Ali

Abstract


Politeness is a strategy used to have interaction in daily conversation.  This study investigates the following questions: (1) What types of FTAs (Face Threatening Acts) and politeness strategies frequently used by females and males in a short interview’s conversation?, and (2) Is there any effect of the relation of close friendship toward politeness?. The method used was qualitative research. The five participants are included in terms of 2 females and 3 males in the age of around 30 - 40 from different various ethnic groups, occupations, and status. The instrument used was a FGD (Focus Group Discussion)  to collect the data from the participants’ utterances as a source of data with the controversial topic. The procedures used to analyze the data were listening to the recorded  utterances, transcribing the raw data and translating them into English, classifying the raw data of utterances into female and male section to find out the differences of their politeness and identifying the FTAs and analyzing the types of politeness strategies used.  Based on the findings, female participants’ dominance types of FTA are criticized, followed by complaining, which indicates an impolite degree. On the other hand, male participants’ dominance types of FTAs used are confessing, which means a polite degree. Second, the close relation of friendship influences the degree of politeness, which produces the opposite result from the previous studies. In these findings, the data showed that females are less polite than males. Based on these factors, women may react less politely in the data, but according to the three elements, it must be taken into consideration that the impact is reasonable.



Keywords


politeness strategies, male and female politeness

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Agies, D. F. (2012). Gender and politeness: Politeness strategies in the popular Turkish series “Avrupa Yakas?” (European Side). International Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 6.1, 91-106.

Akbari, Z. (2015). The Realization of Politeness Principles in Persian. Karen Linguistics Issues. 12, 120-135.

Burke, M & Kraut, R. (2008). Mind your Ps and Qs: the impact of politeness and rudeness in online communities. ACM. 5,

-284.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals of language usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P. (1980). How and why are women more polite: Some evidence from a Mayan community. Reprinted in J. Coates (Ed.), Language and Gender (2- 22). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

Cheung, C. S. (2009). Politeness strategies of Chinese and American speakers. LCOM Papers. 1, 45–54.

Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 219-236.

Kasper, G. (1990). Linguistic politeness: current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics. 14(2), 193-218.

Keikhaie, Y & Mozaffari, Z. (2012). Socio linguistic Survey on Females’ Politeness Strategies in the Same Gender and in the Cross-Gender Relationship. British Journal of English Linguistics, 5 (6), 33-40.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Lakoff, R. (2004). Language and woman's place. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Meier, A. (1995). Passages of Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics. 24, 381-392.

Mills, S. (2003). Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Montgomery, M. B.(1998). Multiple modals in LAGS and LAMSAS in from the Gulf States and beyond: The legacy of Lee Pederson and LAGS. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.

Segal, S. (2004). Cultural constraints of gender in encyclopedia of sex and gender.1.Retrieved from http://link.springer.com.

Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York, NY: Morrow.

Trudgill, P. (1974). Sociolinguistics: An Introduction. Harmon's Worth: Penguin Books Ltd.

Turker, T & Akrabov, A. (2016). Cross cultural variation in perception of politeness norms. British Journal of English Linguistics. 4 (6), 1- 10.

Yule, G. (2006). The Pragmatics of Politeness in Scientific Articles in Applied linguistics. New York: Oxford.

Wagner, L. (2012). Positive- and Negative-Politeness Strategies: Apologizing in the Speech Community of Cuernavaca, Mexico. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27, 93-109.

Watts, R. (2003). Politeness (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32502/ecj.v7i2.6703

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 English Community Journal

The Departement of English Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang

Jl. Jenderal A. Yani 13 Ulu, Seberang Ulu II, Palembang (30263), Indonesia.

Indexed by :

 

English Community Journal has been listed in :

 

Creative Commons License
English Community Journal by http://jurnal.um-palembang.ac.id/index.php/englishcommunity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.