IPP PROGRAM EVALUATION MODEL OF TEACHER SUPERVISION AT SDN 35 TALANG KELAPA, BANYUASIN REGENCY

Andria Mella Elfarissyah, Muchlas Suseno, Syamsi Setiadi

Abstract


The objective of this study was to evaluate the teacher supervision program based on the CIPP model that consists of context, input, process and product at SDN 35 Talang Kelapa, Banyuasin regency. Determining the effectiveness of the program supervision evaluation process is seen from the level of achievement of the program evaluation objectives that have been determined by the school. This research was a qualitative study that used the CIPP model by evaluating each component: context, input, process and product to achieve an effective supervision program evaluation process. Sources of research data are teachers at SDN 35 Talang Kelapa, Banyuasin Regency. Collecting the research data by using instruments, those were interview and questionnaire. From the results of the study, it showed that the implementation of the teacher supervision program based on the CIPP model (context, input, process and product) was declared that good and effective.

Keywords


evaluation; CIPP model; teacher supervision program

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfred North Whitehead (1957). “The Aims of Education and Other Essays”. New York. The New American library.

Allen, M.J.& Yen, W.M. 1979. Introduction to Measurement Theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Inc.

Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Lia Yuliana. (2008). Manajemen Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media.

Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Cepi Safruddin Abdul Jabar. (2009). Evaluasi program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 41 Tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Proses untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta:Depdiknas

Babbie, E. (2004). The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsword.

Djamarah, S. B. (2008). Strategi belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Rineka Cipta.

Frechtling, J.A. (2007). Logic Modeling Methods in Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

Harsanto Radno. (2007). Pengelolaan Kelas yang Dinamis. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Osokoya, I., Atinmo, M., Ajayi, S. A., & Sarumi, A. (2010). An evaluation of nomadic education programme in Nigeria. Academic Leadership: The Online Journal, 8(4), 9.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Materi Pelatihan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan.

Madaus, G.F., Scriven, M.S., & Stufflebeam, D.L. (1993). Evaluation models, viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

Majid, Abdul. (2007). Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Rosda Karya.

McDavid, J.C. & Hawthorn, L.L.R. Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement: an Introduction to Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Molope, M., & Oduaran, A. (2020). Evaluation of the community development practitioners’ professional development programme: CIPP model application. Development in Practice, 30(2), 194-206.

Nana Sudjana (2006). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung:PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Sarana dan Prasarana.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 25 Tahun 2008 tentang Standar Tenaga Perpustakaan Sekolah

Purwanto. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif untuk Psikologi dan Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Rohani, Ahmad. (2004). Pengelolaan Pengajaran. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta. Cet. Ke-2.

Sardiman, A. M. (2004). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar-Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Sjarkawi. (2006). Pembentukan Kepribadian Melalui Peningkatan Pertimbangan Moral. Jakarta: Depdiknas Dirjen Dikti.

Sudjana, N. (2012). Pengawas dan Kepengawasan. Bekasi: Bina Mitra Publishing.

Sudjana, N & Dharma, S. (2013). Menyusun Program Kepengawasan Panduan Bagi Pengawas Sekolah. Jakarta: Bina Mitra publishing.

Sudjana, N & Dharma, S & Wastandar. (2012). Pemantauan Pelaksanaan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Bekasi: Bina Mitra Publishing.

Sukardi. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dan Kepelatihan. Yogyakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sukardi. (2012). Evaluasi Pendidikan Prinsip & Operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Stuflebeam, D.L. & Shinkfield, a. j. (1985). Systematic evaluation: a selfinstructional guide to theory and practice. Kluwer: nijhoff publisher.

Stufflebeam, D. L & Shinkfield, A. J. (1986). Systematic Evaluation: A self Instructional Guide to Theory and Practice. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). The metaevaluation imperative. American journal of evaluation, 22(2), 183-209.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1994). Empowerment evaluation, objectivist evaluation, and evaluation standards: Where the future of evaluation should not go and where it needs to go. Evaluation practice, 15(3), 321-338.

Syaodih, Nana Sukmadinata. (2007). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Undang-Undang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional (Sisdiknas) Nomor 20 Tahun 2003

Wirawan (2012). Evaluasi Teri, Model, Standar Aplikasi dan Profesi. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32502/ecj.v6i1.4009

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 English Community Journal

The Departement of English Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang

Jl. Jenderal A. Yani 13 Ulu, Seberang Ulu II, Palembang (30263), Indonesia.

Indexed by :

 

English Community Journal has been listed in :

 

Creative Commons License
English Community Journal by http://jurnal.um-palembang.ac.id/index.php/englishcommunity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.