AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEXICAL AMBIGUITY USED IN COCO MOVIE SCRIPT

Ratih Faina, Tri Rositasari, Andriamella Elfarissyah

Abstract


The objectives of this study were to describe the form of homonym of the lexical ambiguity and to analyze the most dominant of homonym of the lexical ambiguity that used in Coco movie script by Lee Unkrich and Adrian Molina. In analysis of lexical ambiguity, it just focused on homonym that used by Miguel as the main character from the movie script. This study used a descriptive qualitative research and it was obtained by using documentation method and the conversation of movie script as a research instrument. The conversation of Coco movie script was used to identify and get information about homonym, it showed that there were two forms of homonym in lexical ambiguity that used in Coco movie script and they were homophone and homograph. Based on the result of data, it was found that there were 987 conversations of Coco movie script both in homophone and homograph. From 987 conversations of Coco movie script, it can be said that 226 conversations used the homophone words, it consisted of 70 homophone words and it occurred in 645 times. Then, 70 conversations used the homograph words, it consisted of 29 homograph words and it occurred in 06 times. So, it can be concluded that the most dominant of  homonym forms of lexical ambiguity in Coco movie script was homophone which consisted of 70 words and it occured in 645 times.


Keywords


analysis; lexical ambiguity; homonym; movie

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C.,& Sorensen,C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Eighth Edition.

Aydogan, H & Akbarov, A. A. (2014). The Four Basic Language Skills, Whole Language & Intergrated Skill Approach in Mainstream University Classrooms in Turkey. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences.

Best, J.W. & Kahn, J.V. (2006). Research in Tenth Edition.

Hong, J-F. (2015). Chapter 2 Previous Researches on Lexical Ambiguity and Polysemy. DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-44556-3_2

Hurford, J. R., Heasley, B., & Smith, M. B. (2007). Semantics: A Coursebook. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Kothari, C.R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods & Teachniques. New Delhi. New Age International (p). Ltd.

Kreidler, C.W. (2002). Introducing English Semantics. Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane. London.

Murtagh, F., Ganz, A. & McKie. S. (2018). The Structure of Narrative: the Case of Film Scripts. arXiv:0805.3799v1

Rabiah, S. (2012). Language as A Tool for Communication and Culural Reality Discloser. Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Makassar.

Ronfard. R. (2004). Reading Movies – An Integrated DVD Player for Browsing Movies And Their Scripts. ACM 1-58113-893-8/04/0010

Roseline, A. & Samuel F, J. (2018). Ambiguity in Ikwere: An Exploration. International Journal of Language, Literature and Gender Studies (LALIGENS). Bahir Dar- Ethiopia.7 (2),

Safataj, M. & Amiryousef, M. (2016). Effect of Homonymous Set of Words Instruction on Vocabulary Development and Retention of Young Female Elementary Learners in Iranian EFL Context through Metalinguistic Awareness. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0611.05




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32502/ecj.v5i1.3307

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 English Community Journal

The Departement of English Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang

Jl. Jenderal A. Yani 13 Ulu, Seberang Ulu II, Palembang (30263), Indonesia.

Indexed by :

 

English Community Journal has been listed in :

 

Creative Commons License
English Community Journal by http://jurnal.um-palembang.ac.id/index.php/englishcommunity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.